The new Environment Bill: 5 things you need to know

Energy & Climate Change, Management & Regulation, Natural Environment

The new Environment Bill: 5 things you need to know

Big Ben and the houses of parliament on a sunny day

The Environment Bill is back, and according to Environment Secretary Theresa VIllers, it "sets a gold standard for improving air quality, protecting nature, increasing recycling and cutting down plastic waste". The Bill joins the Agriculture Bill and Fisheries Bill to set in place a legal framework for the environment for the UK outside of the European Union.

The new Bill is genuinely a once in a generation opportunity to protect our environment and set a course for nature recovery in the UK. After the 31st January, the UK government will be directly responsible for environmental law and policy for the first time in decades. In the face of a climate and ecological emergency, it’s more important than ever that we have a robust framework for improving our natural environment.

Here’s the five things you need to know about the new Bill:

1. What's new since the previous Environment Bill:

The majority of the Bill remains unchanged since the version which was laid in October 2019 and then fell with the call of the general election in December, but there are a couple of significant new sections:

    • Non-regression but not as we know it

Along with many other green groups, we advocated for a commitment to non-regression on environmental standards after leaving the EU. The new Bill does include provisions almost to this effect, but not in so many words. The Bill includes a new requirement for the Secretary of State to review and report every two years on “developments in international environmental protection legislation which appear to the Secretary of State to be significant”, but there is no requirement to update British law in line with any developments. There is also a new requirement for the Secretary of State to make a statement on any new Bill that would constitute environmental law, saying whether or not it will reduce the existing level of environmental protection under existing law. These two provisions combine to put scrutiny on the Secretary of State if the UK were weakening environmental protection or lowering environmental standards, but there is no recourse or consequence were this to be so.

    • New power to ban exporting plastic waste to developing countries

This provision enables the government to make good on a Conservative manifesto pledge, by giving it the power to ban or restrict the export of plastic waste to non-OECD countries, although this only underlines our existing obligations under the Basel convention. We believe that this must be accompanied by measures to incentivise domestic processing, through incentivising producers to use easily recyclable packaging, and to innovate packaging design to include more recyclability.

2. The new watchdog still lacks teeth

The Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), which will replace the scrutiny and enforcement functions previously provided by the European Union, will hold the government and public bodies to account on its implementation of environmental law. However, we previously called for increased independence for the OEP, and unfortunately this is still lacking. The OEP will be an instrument of government, with its budget set by the Secretary of State, who will also appoint its Chair and non-executives. To be truly independent of government, the OEP should be funded by and report to Parliament, in order to be able to investigate breaches of environmental law effectively.

There are, however, some small windows open to ensure the independence of the OEP. According to the Bill, “in exercising functions in respect of the OEP, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to protect its independence”, as well as a clause requiring the OEP to “act objectively and impartially”. Were the Secretary of State to undermine the ability of the OEP to act objectively or impartially, or to not protect its independence, such as through under-resourcing the watchdog, this could be open to legal challenge as it would be in contravention of the law.

3. Long-term environmental targets will be legally-binding:

The Bill requires the Secretary of State to set at least one long-term target (at least 15 years) for each of the following priority areas:

  • Air quality;
  • Water;
  • Biodiversity;
  • Resource efficiency and waste reduction.

In addition to these priority areas, the Secretary of State must set a target for PM2.5 in ambient air before 31st October 2022, but the Bill falls short of requiring the target to be in line with World Health Organisation guidelines by 2030, as had been widely expected. The targets set will be legally-binding on the Secretary of State, and be reviewed by 31st January 2023, and then every five years thereafter.

Before setting targets, the Bill requires the Secretary of State to “seek advice from persons the Secretary of State considers to be independent and to have relevant expertise”. To ensure long-term commitment to the targets from successive Secretaries and governments, they must be consulted on widely, cross-sector and cross-party.

4. Loopholes on the environmental principles remain:

The environmental principles in EU law have led to long-term environmental improvement over recent decades, particularly in water and air quality, and enshrining them in UK is crucial to the future enhancement of our natural environment. We were previously concerned by the language of the Bill regarding the requirement of Ministers of the Crown to “have regard to” the policy statement on the environmental principles when making decisions. The newly published Bill requires Ministers to “have due regard” to them, which is somewhat improved, but not quite the “act in accordance” with that we and the industry were calling for.

The exemptions from applying the policy statement on environmental principles to decisions on tax and spending, and for the Ministry of Defence remain.

5. 25 Year Environment Plan on a statutory footing:

As previously, the Bill includes a requirement for 15-year Environmental Improvement Plans (EIP), with the 25 Year Environment Plan to be the first such plan. The government must report annually on progress against the EIP, review and revise the EIPs five-yearly, with the first one due by 31st January 2023. As well as putting the 25YEP on a statutory footing, we welcome the new requirement for all public bodies to have regard to the conservation and enhancement of biodiversity under the 2006 NERC Act, as we advocated.

Of course, that alone won’t ensure delivery of the 25 Year Environment Plan ambitions. Our report 25 Year Environment Plan: ambition to realisation shows that the challenge to deliver environmental recovery and leave the environment in a better state than we inherited it requires action right across government and will require a plethora of bodies to deliver against it.

We shouldn’t undervalue this wide-ranging and ambitious Environment Bill, but it’s falling short of gold standard in its current form. We look forward to working with government, MPs, and Peers on improving the Bill so that we have a truly world-leading legislation which ensures the long-term protection and improvement of our natural environment.

Heather Gardner


Share this article

Become a member

Whether you are studying, actively looking to progress your career, or already extensively experienced, our membership will add value and recognition to your achievements. We can actively help you progress throughout your career.

Become a member

View our events

We organise a wide portfolio of UK and international thought leading events, providing an industry recognised forum for debate, CPD and sector networking. These events also support our policy work and inform key initiatives.

View our events